The universal question that I will be focusing on in this blog: "Is government necessary for the existence of peace?"
I am interested in this question because it addresses societal order and what happens when nothing is left to organize society-- topics which intrigue me. It is pertinent to many novels and has been debated between anarchists and large-government supporters forever. Both sides have well founded and compelling arguments; the challenge will be to prove who's right. On a personal note, I would like to relate this question to my own experiences. When I was a young child, I attended a day care which prohibited bringing toys from home. I always adhered to this rule until the day when our supervisor left. I broke the rule by bringing a personal possession to class the next day while under the impression that our supervisor had left permanently. The substitute teacher was unhappy with my actions. In the absence of a ruling body, or government, I had succeeded in breaking the peace. I defied the norm, creating a non peaceful situation. This example may seem inapplicable as it addresses an event which unfolded when I was probably 5 years old; through other textual examples, I will seek to expose the truth (or lack thereof) in the necessity of some form of government (whether it be tangible or not) for the existence of peace.
What is your working definition of "government"? What of "peace"?
ReplyDelete